
I write this while listening to something called SolarBeat that Suzie introduced to me via a lj post and a twitter account.

To deny the past is to deny the future. A man does not make his destiny: he accepts it or denies it. If the rowan's roots are shallow, it bears no crown.
– The Farthest Shore Ursula K. Le Guin
I've been cleaning, going through my old books. My old journals. My old highschool year books.
My ten year reunion is this year. In a few months. And I've been worried about how I stack up against my peers. According to facebook, some are doctors. Others teach music. They have succeeded in their fields of excellence.
And I read through those comments left behind ten long, long, years ago. Promises to “always keep in touch.” and phone numbers to places that don't exist anymore.
I'm not who I was, but I'm very much a product of those years.
All the bleeding (both actual and metaphorical)
All the bad choices.
All the hatred and presumed love.
All the cries for help that fell on deaf ears.
All the cries for help I didn't know I was screaming.
If I could go back in time, I know things would be different. That I would have gotten help earlier. That I would have been diagnosed with being bipolar. That skeletons in my parents' closets would come out sooner. I would have learned how to be whole earlier.
But I wouldn't be who I am.
I wouldn't have learned the hard way that love can hurt more than anything.
That it can burn.
That it could throw another person down a flight of stairs.
I wouldn't know how to pick up my own pieces.
I wouldn't know how broken I truly was.
And if I did when I was sixteen, seventeen? What? I would have gone to the hospital and rumors would have spread that I was crazy. Other kids wouldn't understand. The teachers might, but... stigma.
I wouldn't be the same, for better or for worse.
I wouldn't be strong enough to know how strong I am.
Or that love doesn't mean black eyes or bruised thighs.
That love is having someone tell you a bedtime story over the phone,
or rubbing your head until you fall asleep.
Ten years is a very long time.
But I don't regret it. I don't deny it. It's there.
Here's to the future.
I read in a book that the objectivity of thought can be expressed using the verb "to think" in the impersonal third person: saying not "I think" but "it thinks" as we say "it rains." There is thought in the universe -- this is the constant from which we must set out every time.
Will I ever be able to say, "Today it writes," just like "Today it rains," "Today it is windy"? Only when it will come natural to me to use the verb "write" in the impersonal form will I be able to hope that through me is expressed something less limited that the personality of a individual.
And for the verb "to read"? Will we be able to say, "Today it reads" as we say "Today it rains"? If you think about it, reading is a necessarily individual act, far more that writing. If we assume that writing manages to go beyond the limitations of the author, it will continue to have a meaning only when it is read by a single person and passes through his mental circuits. Only the ability to be read by a given individual proves that what is written shares in the power of writing, a power based on something that goes beyond the individual. The universe will express itself as long as somebody will be able to say, "I read, therefore it writes."
If on a Winter's Night a Traveler by Italo Calvino
Throw away the mantle
Awake from your uncertain hesitation
No way to describe or equate the feeling
No end to what is at your command
A million thoughts run through you
Concentric circles, ever greater
But you have always known
That this is not who you are
To your questions there'll be answers
VNV Nation - "Perpetual"